Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: tiny refactor on port forward #417

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 19, 2024

Conversation

mojtaba-esk
Copy link
Member

@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk commented Jun 4, 2024

A small refactor on PortForwardPod function. It needs more refactor in future, however this PR suggests a small change to avoid having type check warning as the old code tried to compare an io.Writer object with nil

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved error handling and buffer initialization for port forwarding operations.

@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk requested a review from a team June 4, 2024 14:48
@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk self-assigned this Jun 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes in pkg/k8s/k8s_pod.go focus on refining the PortForwardPod function. These improvements include restructuring variable and channel declarations, initializing stdout and stderr buffers directly, and enhancing error handling mechanisms during the port forwarding process.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
pkg/k8s/k8s_pod.go Restructured variable and channel declarations, initialized stdout and stderr buffers, and improved error handling in the PortForwardPod function.

Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant PortForwardPod
    participant stdout
    participant stderr
    participant stopChan
    participant readyChan
    participant errChan

    Client->>PortForwardPod: Call PortForwardPod()
    PortForwardPod->>stdout: Initialize new Buffer
    PortForwardPod->>stderr: Initialize new Buffer
    PortForwardPod->>stopChan: Create channel
    PortForwardPod->>readyChan: Create channel
    PortForwardPod->>errChan: Create channel
    PortForwardPod->>Client: Return initialized channels and buffers
    Client->>PortForwardPod: Handle port forwarding
    PortForwardPod->>errChan: Send error if any
    errChan->>Client: Receive error
Loading

Poem

In the realm of code so bright,
Channels and buffers take their flight,
Errors now caught with care so fine,
Port forwarding sings in perfect line.
A rabbit's joy, in bytes it shows,
Through streams and flows, the data goes.
🌟🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pkg/k8s/k8s_pod.go (1)

Line range hint 72-72: Address multiple undefined errors reported by static analysis.

The static analysis tool has identified numerous instances where variables and functions are used but not defined within the visible scope of the code. This could indicate missing imports, typos, or logical errors in the code structure. Each instance needs to be verified and corrected to ensure the code is functional and error-free.

Also applies to: 85-85, 93-93, 75-75, 79-79, 104-104, 130-130, 145-145, 167-167, 185-185, 187-187, 191-191, 203-203, 208-208, 225-225, 244-244, 247-247, 249-249, 261-261, 277-277, 280-280, 301-301, 303-303, 475-475, 481-481, 487-487, 513-513, 518-518, 544-544, 548-548, 570-570, 587-587, 593-593, 599-599, 614-614, 619-619, 637-637

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 254f7cd and 8d20145.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • pkg/k8s/k8s_pod.go (3 hunks)
Additional context used
golangci-lint
pkg/k8s/k8s_pod.go

72-72: undefined: Client (typecheck)


85-85: undefined: Client (typecheck)


93-93: undefined: Client (typecheck)


75-75: undefined: ErrPreparingPod (typecheck)


79-79: undefined: ErrCreatingPod (typecheck)


104-104: undefined: ErrDeletingPod (typecheck)


130-130: undefined: ErrDeployingPod (typecheck)


145-145: undefined: ErrGettingPod (typecheck)


167-167: undefined: ErrGettingPod (typecheck)


185-185: undefined: getClusterConfig (typecheck)


187-187: undefined: ErrGettingK8sConfig (typecheck)


191-191: undefined: ErrCreatingExecutor (typecheck)


203-203: undefined: ErrExecutingCommand (typecheck)


208-208: undefined: ErrCommandExecution (typecheck)


225-225: undefined: ErrDeletingPodFailed (typecheck)


244-244: undefined: ErrGettingPod (typecheck)


247-247: undefined: getClusterConfig (typecheck)


249-249: undefined: ErrGettingClusterConfig (typecheck)


261-261: undefined: ErrCreatingRoundTripper (typecheck)


277-277: undefined: ErrCreatingPortForwarder (typecheck)


280-280: undefined: ErrPortForwarding (typecheck)


301-301: undefined: ErrForwardingPorts (typecheck)


302-302: undefined: waitRetry (typecheck)


303-303: undefined: ErrPortForwardingTimeout (typecheck)


475-475: undefined: ErrParsingMemoryRequest (typecheck)


481-481: undefined: ErrParsingMemoryLimit (typecheck)


487-487: undefined: ErrParsingCPURequest (typecheck)


513-513: undefined: ErrBuildingContainerVolumes (typecheck)


518-518: undefined: ErrBuildingResources (typecheck)


544-544: undefined: ErrBuildingInitContainerVolumes (typecheck)


548-548: undefined: ErrBuildingInitContainerCommand (typecheck)


570-570: undefined: ErrBuildingPodVolumes (typecheck)


587-587: undefined: ErrPreparingMainContainer (typecheck)


593-593: undefined: ErrPreparingInitContainer (typecheck)


599-599: undefined: ErrPreparingPodVolumes (typecheck)


614-614: undefined: ErrPreparingSidecarContainer (typecheck)


619-619: undefined: ErrPreparingSidecarVolumes (typecheck)


637-637: undefined: ErrCreatingPodSpec (typecheck)

Additional comments not posted (2)
pkg/k8s/k8s_pod.go (2)

273-273: Change io.Writer to bytes.Buffer to avoid type check issues.

This change addresses the type check warning effectively by ensuring that stdout and stderr are always non-nil, which avoids potential nil pointer dereferences when used later in the code.


279-280: Check for errors in stderr before proceeding.

This is a robust error handling practice. Checking stderr before proceeding ensures that any errors during the port forwarding setup are caught early, preventing further execution when the setup is already known to be faulty.

Tools
golangci-lint

280-280: undefined: ErrPortForwarding (typecheck)

pkg/k8s/k8s_pod.go Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/k8s/k8s_pod.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 19, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit a00e9d5 Jun 19, 2024
11 checks passed
@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk deleted the mojtaba/fix-portforward-tiny-refactor branch June 19, 2024 07:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants